Subanana vs Fathom (2026): A Documentation-Based Comparison

2026-05-10
KKevin Wong

Fathom's pitch is hard to argue with at the entry tier: free, unlimited meeting recordings, unlimited AI transcripts, and instant AI summaries — no minute caps, no time limits. The paid tiers add advanced AI summaries, CRM sync to Salesforce / HubSpot, deal coaching, and SOC 2 + HIPAA compliance.

If you're searching for a Fathom alternative, you're usually hitting one of three gaps: language coverage (Fathom's site doesn't specify support beyond English-leaning meeting workflows), live multilingual event captioning (Fathom is a meeting tool, not an event platform), or you want something more focused than a sales-team CRM-integrated meeting assistant.

Subanana plays in that narrower transcription + live-caption space, with a specific strength in Cantonese, Mandarin, and mixed-language workflows. Different categories — here's how the two products compare.

Disclosure: I run Subanana. This post compares each tool using its own published documentation — pricing pages, features pages — pulled in May 2026. No fabricated head-to-head test; both tools have free tiers, and your own audio is the right way to test accuracy.


TL;DR

  • Pick Fathom if your team is English-only, you live inside Salesforce or HubSpot and want native CRM sync, you need a generous free tier with unlimited recordings + transcriptions + AI summaries, or HIPAA / SOC 2 Type II compliance is required.
  • Pick Subanana if any meaningful portion of your work involves Cantonese / Mandarin / mixed Asian languages, you run live multilingual events with audience-facing captions, you want user-selectable LLMs for meeting summaries, or you're a team of 3+ on light-to-moderate per-user usage where workspace pricing scales better than per-seat.
  • The shape of the choice: Fathom is the sales-team meeting assistant with a generous free tier and CRM-native workflow. Subanana is the multilingual transcription + live-event-captioning specialist. They overlap on "transcribe English meetings" but their best uses point at very different jobs.

Pricing snapshot (May 2026)

Fathom (per seat, USD)

PlanMonthlyAnnual (effective /mo)Recordings + AI summariesCRM syncMin seats
Free$0Unlimited recordings + transcriptions + instant AI summaries1
Premium$20$16Free features + advanced summaries + AI action items + meeting assistant1
Team$19/seat$15/seatPremium + global search + SSO + custom vocabulary2
Business$34/seat$25/seatTeam + CRM field sync + Deal View + AI scorecards + custom retention✅ Salesforce / HubSpot2

The Team and Business tiers require a 2-user minimum. All tiers retain "unlimited recordings + transcriptions." The differences between tiers are AI feature depth and CRM workflow rather than transcription quotas.

Subanana (per workspace, USD)

PlanMonthlyAnnual (effective /mo)File limitAnnual minute allocation
Free$015 min/file, 3 GB
Lite$18$93 hr/file, 15 GB720 min/yr
Pro$30$183 hr/file, 15 GB2,160 min/yr
Max$75$503 hr/file, 15 GB7,200 min/yr
BusinessContact salesContact salesCustomCustom

Per-workspace pricing. Free tier doesn't allow subtitle/transcript download; paid tiers enable downloads. Subanana minutes don't roll over across billing cycles.

The two pricing models are very different shapes. Fathom's free tier is unusually generous for individual meeting capture — no minute cap, unlimited recordings + AI summaries. Subanana's free tier is more constrained (15-min file cap) and is sized for testing rather than ongoing use. For paid usage, the comparison flips: Subanana's per-workspace pricing scales better for teams of 3+ on moderate-not-industrial usage; Fathom's per-seat model adds linearly per teammate.


Where Fathom wins

I'll start here because these are real strengths sourced from Fathom's published pages.

1. Genuinely generous free tier

Fathom Free includes unlimited recordings, unlimited transcriptions, and instant AI summaries — at $0 with no minute cap. This is one of the most generous free tiers in the meeting transcription category. Subanana's free tier caps each individual file at 15 minutes, which is sufficient for testing the product but not for ongoing use. For solo professionals who only need basic AI meeting capture and don't need Cantonese / live captioning / multilingual workflows, Fathom's free tier may be the right tool — full stop, no upgrade pressure.

2. Native CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, Asana)

Fathom's Business tier includes native CRM field sync to Salesforce and HubSpot, plus integrations with Notion and Asana. Subanana doesn't currently ship native CRM, dialer, or push-out integrations. For sales teams whose workflow lives in Salesforce or HubSpot, Fathom's tighter integration loop is a real advantage.

3. Sales coaching workflow (Deal View, AI Scorecards)

Fathom Business adds Deal View, coaching metrics, and AI Scorecards — sales-coaching tools where managers can review rep performance, track deal health, and standardise feedback. Subanana doesn't compete in this category. For sales-led organisations, Fathom is purpose-built for the workflow.

4. SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA compliance

Fathom advertises SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and HIPAA compliance. Subanana doesn't currently advertise HIPAA or SOC 2 compliance. For healthcare workflows or enterprise procurement that requires either, Fathom is the correct pick today.

5. ChatGPT & Claude integrations for downstream processing

Fathom's homepage advertises "ChatGPT & Claude integrations" for processing meeting data within those external assistant platforms. For teams that have heavy workflows in those tools, Fathom's downstream-processing affordances are documented.

6. Bot-free capture as a UX advantage

Fathom advertises bot-free capture — the meeting joining flow doesn't surface a visible bot in the participant list. For teams that don't want their attendees to see a "Fathom Bot is recording" line in the meeting, this is a documented UX advantage. Subanana's meeting capture for Google Meet / Microsoft Teams uses a meeting-bot model which does appear in the participant list.


Where Subanana wins

1. Cantonese, Mandarin, mixed-language transcription

Fathom's published pages don't specify language coverage beyond English-leaning meeting workflows. The product is designed for US workplace meetings. For Hong Kong / Taiwan / Cantonese-speaking workflows specifically, Fathom isn't a viable option. Subanana publishes ~95% on Cantonese and supports the colloquial-to-formal Chinese conversion that Hong Kong professional contexts require.

2. Cantonese colloquial-to-formal conversion

Subanana converts spoken Cantonese (e.g. "我哋 call 完之後 follow up") into written Chinese automatically. This is unique to Subanana — Fathom (like other US meeting tools) transcribes spoken speech literally without dialect-to-written-language conversion.

3. Live multilingual translation with audience-facing captions

Subanana runs real-time captioning + translation for live events with an audience-facing shareable link — attendees scan a QR code and choose how to display the live captions on their phones — source, translated, or both side-by-side, among the languages the host pre-configured for the event. Fathom is a meeting transcription tool; it doesn't offer live event captioning. For conferences, university lectures, multilingual board meetings, Subanana is purpose-built.

4. User-selectable summary LLM

Subanana lets users pick which LLM writes the meeting summary — multiple frontier models supported, with the list expanding as new models ship. Fathom uses a single underlying summary model. Fathom's "ChatGPT & Claude integrations" are downstream processing handoffs, not in-product LLM choice for the summary itself.

5. Bilingual SRT export

Subanana exports a single SRT file containing both source transcription and translated text (one above the other per cue). Useful for HK / TW content with English subtitles. Fathom doesn't focus on subtitle export workflows — it's optimised for meeting summaries and CRM sync, not video subtitling.

6. Per-workspace pricing for teams (above 2 seats)

Subanana's per-workspace pricing means a 5-person team pays the same as a 1-person team at a given tier. Fathom Business is $25/seat/mo annual minimum 2 seats — so a 5-seat team is $125/mo. Subanana Pro for the same team is ~$18/mo. For teams of 3+ on light-to-moderate per-user usage, the math diverges; for teams on heavy CRM-integrated sales workflows, the comparison flips because Fathom's CRM features are the value.


Side-by-side feature table

FeatureFathom BusinessSubanana Pro
Free tier✅ Unlimited recordings + transcriptions + AI summary✅ 15 min/file (3 GB)
Cantonese specificallyNot specified in published coverage✅ ~95% published, Mandarin higher
Colloquial-to-formal Chinese
User-selectable summary LLM❌ (single model)
Live multilingual captions (event-scale, audience-facing)
Bilingual SRT (single file, dual-track)Not advertised
Native Salesforce / HubSpot CRM sync❌ (manual export)
Deal View / AI Scorecards (sales coaching)
SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA compliance
Bot-free meeting capture❌ (uses meeting bot for Meet / Teams)
Speaker diarization
Pricing modelPer seat (min 2 on team plans)Per workspace
Storage modelNot separately publishedNo aggregate cap; per-file limit only (15 GB paid)

So which should you pick?

Pick Fathom if:

  • Your team is English-only or English-heavy
  • You live inside Salesforce or HubSpot and need native CRM sync
  • You're a solo professional who wants a generous free tier with unlimited AI meeting capture
  • Sales coaching workflows (Deal View, AI Scorecards) are part of your job
  • HIPAA or SOC 2 Type II compliance is required
  • You prefer bot-free meeting capture

Pick Subanana if:

  • Any meaningful portion of your work involves Cantonese, Mandarin, or mixed Asian languages
  • You need user-selectable LLMs for meeting summaries
  • You run live multilingual events that need audience-facing captions
  • You need bilingual SRT in a single file
  • You're a team of 3+ on moderate per-user usage where workspace pricing scales better
  • You don't need CRM-native integration (manual export is acceptable)

The honest framing: Fathom is the sales-team meeting assistant with a famously generous free tier and tight CRM workflow. Subanana is the multilingual transcription + live-event-captioning specialist. Pick by which job you actually need done — they don't really compete on the same axis.


FAQ

Is Fathom really free with unlimited transcriptions?

Yes — Fathom Free includes unlimited recordings, unlimited transcriptions, and instant AI summaries at $0. The paid tiers add advanced AI features (action items, meeting assistant, CRM sync, coaching tools), not capacity. For pure meeting capture without AI workflow needs, the free tier is a real product, not a teaser.

Does Fathom support Cantonese?

Fathom's published pages don't specify language coverage beyond English-leaning meeting workflows. The product is designed for US workplace meetings. For Cantonese-specific workflows, Fathom isn't a viable option.

Can Subanana auto-push notes to Salesforce / HubSpot?

Not natively today. There's no shipped Salesforce, HubSpot, or other CRM integration. The current workflow is to export the meeting summary or transcript and paste it into the CRM activity manually. For sales teams whose entire workflow is CRM-centric, this is more friction than Fathom's native sync.

What about HIPAA?

Fathom advertises HIPAA compliance. Subanana doesn't currently. For healthcare workflows that involve PHI, Fathom is the correct pick today.

Can I migrate from Fathom to Subanana?

Yes. Subanana imports audio and video files in mp4, mov, m4a, mp3, ogg, webm. Fathom lets you export your recordings and transcripts, which you can re-process in Subanana.

What about live event captioning?

Fathom is a post-meeting tool — it captures and summarises recorded meetings, not live events. Subanana includes real-time captioning + translation with an audience-facing shareable link (QR code; attendees see live captions in their chosen language on their phones). For conferences, lectures, multilingual events, this is a different product category and Subanana is purpose-built for it.


Related comparisons

If you're comparing several meeting transcription tools, see also:


Try Subanana free → — no payment method required.

Boost Your Efficiency with Subanana

No payment method required
Free Trial
Cancel Anytime